Variant-specific Mendelian Risk Prediction Model.

Many pathogenic sequence variants (PSVs) have been associated with increased risk of cancers. Mendelian risk prediction models use Mendelian laws of inheritance to predict the probability of having a PSV based on family history, as well as specified PSV frequency and penetrance (agespecific probability of developing cancer given genotype). Most existing models assume penetrance is the same for any PSVs in a certain gene. However, for some genes (for example, BRCA1/2), cancer risk does vary by PSV. We propose an extension of Mendelian risk prediction models to relax the assumption that risk is the same for any PSVs in a certain gene by incorporating variant-specific penetrances and illustrating these extensions on two existing Mendelian risk prediction models, BRCAPRO and PanelPRO. Our proposed BRCAPRO-variant and PanelPRO-variant models incorporate variant-specific BRCA1/2 PSVs through the region classifications. Due to the sparsity of the variant information we classify BRCA1/2 PSVs into three regions; the breast cancer clustering region (BCCR), the ovarian cancer clustering region (OCCR), and an other region. Simulations were conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed BRCAPRO-variant model compared to the existing BRCAPRO model which assumes the penetrance is the same for any PSVs in BRCA1 (and respectively BRCA2). Simulation results showed that the BRCAPRO-variant model was well calibrated to predict region-specific BRCA1/2 carrier status with high discrimination and accuracy on the region-specific level. In addition, we showed that the BRCAPRO-variant model achieved performance gains over the existing risk prediction models in terms of calibration without loss in discrimination and accuracy. We also evaluated the performance of the two proposed models, BRCAPRO-variant and PanelPRO-variant, on a cohort of 1,961 families from the Cancer Genetics Network (CGN). We showed that our proposed models provide region-specific PSV carrier probabilities with high accuracy, while the calibration, discrimination and accuracy of gene-specific PSV carrier probabilities were comparable to the existing gene-specific models. As more variant-specific PSV penetrances become available, we have shown that Mendelian risk prediction models can be extended to integrate the additional information, providing precise variant or region-specific PSV carrier probabilities and improving future cancer risk predictions.

Combining Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models.

Accurate risk stratification is key to reducing cancer morbidity through targeted screening and preventative interventions. Multiple breast cancer risk prediction models are used in clinical practice, and often provide a range of different predictions for the same patient. Integrating information from different models may improve the accuracy of predictions, which would be valuable for both clinicians and patients. BRCAPRO is a widely used model that predicts breast cancer risk based on detailed family history information. A major limitation of this model is that it does not consider non-genetic risk factors. To address this limitation, we expand BRCAPRO by combining it with another popular existing model, BCRAT (i.e., Gail), which uses a largely complementary set of risk factors, most of them non-genetic. We consider two approaches for combining BRCAPRO and BCRAT: (1) modifying the penetrance (age-specific probability of developing cancer given genotype) functions in BRCAPRO using relative hazard estimates from BCRAT, and (2) training an ensemble model that takes BRCAPRO and BCRAT predictions as input. Using both simulated data and data from Newton-Wellesley Hospital and the Cancer Genetics Network, we show that the combination models are able to achieve performance gains over both BRCAPRO and BCRAT. In the Cancer Genetics Network cohort, we show that the proposed BRCAPRO + BCRAT penetrance modification model performs comparably to IBIS, an existing model that combines detailed family history with non-genetic risk factors.

A validation of models for prediction of pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes.

PURPOSE: Models used to predict the probability of an individual having a pathogenic homozygous or heterozygous variant in a mismatch repair gene, such as MMRpro, are widely used. Recently, MMRpro was updated with new colorectal cancer penetrance estimates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive performance of MMRpro and other models for individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer. METHODS: We performed a validation study of 4 models, Leiden, MMRpredict, PREMM5, and MMRpro, using 784 members of clinic-based families from the United States. Predicted probabilities were compared with germline testing results and evaluated for discrimination, calibration, and predictive accuracy. We analyzed several strategies to combine models and improve predictive performance. RESULTS: MMRpro with additional tumor information (MMRpro+) and PREMM5 outperformed the other models in discrimination and predictive accuracy. MMRpro+ was the best calibrated with an observed to expected ratio of 0.98 (95% CI = 0.89-1.08). The combination models showed improvement over PREMM5 and performed similar to MMRpro+. CONCLUSION: MMRpro+ and PREMM5 performed well in predicting the probability of having a pathogenic homozygous or heterozygous variant in a mismatch repair gene. They serve as useful clinical decision tools for identifying individuals who would benefit greatly from screening and prevention strategies.

Multi-syndrome, multi-gene risk modeling for individuals with a family history of cancer with the novel R package PanelPRO.

Identifying individuals who are at high risk of cancer due to inherited germline mutations is critical for effective implementation of personalized prevention strategies. Most existing models focus on a few specific syndromes; however, recent evidence from multi-gene panel testing shows that many syndromes are overlapping, motivating the development of models that incorporate family history on several cancers and predict mutations for a comprehensive panel of genes.We present PanelPRO, a new, open-source R package providing a fast, flexible back-end for multi-gene, multi-cancer risk modeling with pedigree data. It includes a customizable database with default parameter values estimated from published studies and allows users to select any combinations of genes and cancers for their models, including well-established single syndrome BayesMendel models (BRCAPRO and MMRPRO). This leads to more accurate risk predictions and ultimately has a high impact on prevention strategies for cancer and clinical decision making. The package is available for download for research purposes at https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/bayesmendel/panelpro.

Genetic mutations that increase cancer risk can be passed down from parents to their children, which can affect families across many generations. In these families, multiple members may be affected by different types of cancer, and these cancers often develop at an early age. Unaffected family members are often referred to genetic counselling, where they can explore their own risk of cancer. Clinicians and genetic counselors can provide recommendations to minimize cancer risk and inform personal choices on how to manage that risk, such as opting for preventative surgeries or participating in regular screening. In genetic counselling sessions, highly trained clinicians and specialists use software that takes an individual's family history of cancer and uses it to estimate their individual risk of carrying certain genetic mutations. These estimates can in turn help to predict their future risk of cancer. Many existing software packages are limited to estimating risks based on mutations in well-known cancer-related genes, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast and ovarian cancer. However, emerging evidence suggests that many of the genes associated with cancer risk work as part of a complex and overlapping network. Since current risk-profiling software packages are only designed to consider such genes in isolation, they cannot generate the most robust, accurate or comprehensive cancer risk profiles. To address this challenge, Lee, Liang et al. have developed a new risk-profiling software that can integrate a large number of gene mutations and a wide range of potential cancer types to provide more accurate estimates of individual cancer risk. This software, called PanelPRO, uses evidence identified from extensive literature reviews to model the complex interplay between genes and cancer risk. The software not only calculates risks based on known genes, but also allows other developers to integrate new cancer-related genes that may be identified in the future. Importantly, the software is compatible with genetic counselling applications, since it returns answers within seconds when reasonable family and gene database sizes are used. PanelPRO is a new, modern, flexible and efficient software package that provides an important advance towards modelling the vast genetic and biological complexity that contributes to inherited cancer risk. This software is designed to provide a more accurate and comprehensive estimate of cancer risk for individuals with family histories of cancer. As an open-source software, it is freely available for research purposes, and can be licensed by software companies and healthcare organizations to integrate electronic patient records and rapidly identify at-risk individuals across larger patient groups. Ultimately, this software has the potential to improve cancer prevention strategies and optimize the personalized decision-making processes around cancer risk.

Validation of Breast Cancer Risk Models by Race/Ethnicity, Family History and Molecular Subtypes.

(1) Background: The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of four breast cancer risk prediction models by race, molecular subtype, family history of breast cancer, age, and BMI. (2) Methods: Using a cohort of women aged 40-84 without prior history of breast cancer who underwent screening mammography from 2006 to 2015, we generated breast cancer risk estimates using the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment tool (BCRAT), BRCAPRO, Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) and combined BRCAPRO+BCRAT models. Model calibration and discrimination were compared using observed-to-expected ratios (O/E) and the area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) among patients with at least five years of follow-up. (3) Results: We observed comparable discrimination and calibration across models. There was no significant difference in model performance between Black and White women. Model discrimination was poorer for HER2+ and triple-negative subtypes compared with ER/PR+HER2-. The BRCAPRO+BCRAT model displayed improved calibration and discrimination compared to BRCAPRO among women with a family history of breast cancer. Across models, discriminatory accuracy was greater among obese than non-obese women. When defining high risk as a 5-year risk of 1.67% or greater, models demonstrated discordance in 2.9% to 19.7% of patients. (4) Conclusions: Our results can inform the implementation of risk assessment and risk-based screening among women undergoing screening mammography.

Variation in cancer risk among families with genetic susceptibility.

Germline mutations in many genes have been shown to increase the risk of developing cancer. This risk can vary across families who carry mutations in the same gene due to differences in the specific variants, gene-gene interactions, other susceptibility mutations, environmental factors, and behavioral factors. We develop an analytic tool to explore this heterogeneity using family history data. We propose to evaluate the ratio between the number of observed cancer cases in a family and the number of expected cases under a model where risk is assumed to be the same across families. We perform this analysis for both carriers and noncarriers in each family, using carrier probabilities when carrier statuses are unknown, and visualize the results. We first illustrate the approach in simulated data and then apply it to data on colorectal cancer risk in families carrying mutations in Lynch syndrome genes from Creighton University's Hereditary Cancer Center. We show that colorectal cancer risk in carriers can vary widely across families, and that this variation is not matched by a corresponding variation in the noncarriers from the same families. This suggests that the sources of variation in these families are to be found predominantly in variants harbored in the mutated MMR genes considered, or in variants interacting with them.

Practical implementation of frailty models in Mendelian risk prediction.

There are numerous statistical models used to identify individuals at high risk of cancer due to inherited mutations. Mendelian models predict future risk of cancer by using family history with estimated cancer penetrances (age- and sex-specific risk of cancer given the genotype of the mutations) and mutation prevalences. However, there is often residual risk heterogeneity across families even after accounting for the mutations in the model, due to environmental or unobserved genetic risk factors. We aim to improve Mendelian risk prediction by incorporating a frailty model that contains a family-specific frailty vector, impacting the cancer hazard function, to account for this heterogeneity. We use a discrete uniform population frailty distribution and implement a marginalized approach that averages each family's risk predictions over the family's frailty distribution. We apply the proposed approach to improve breast cancer prediction in BRCAPRO, a Mendelian model that accounts for inherited mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes to predict breast and ovarian cancer. We evaluate the proposed model's performance in simulations and real data from the Cancer Genetics Network and show improvements in model calibration and discrimination. We also discuss alternative approaches for incorporating frailties and their strengths and limitations.